Anarchy and Liberty, and the rejection of evil and slavery

This page is a primer, of sorts, for those who are either anarchists already, or for those who sincerely want to look into it, because they’re starting to wake up to the notion that everything to do with “gov” and “auth”, no matter the facade or superficial ostensible differences there might be between the veneers of it, whether “institutional” or “religious” or “scientism-ific”, all that “gov” and “auth” amount to is slavery and evil, so fuck that shit.

Freedom is the essence of everything and veyond.

Anarchy, which is a spiritually conscious philosophy born of self love and love of others, both as Ourselves as individual consciousness and Myself or the I Self, as infinite, unlimited spirit, soul and freedom, defiance, courage, wilder consciousness, etc.

As for Liberty, which is always a result of anarchy, is a conscious interpersonal and social expression of Freedom, seeing as how the first step to true liberty is the rejection of slavery, resulting from the rejection of evil, through the courage to facilitate the righteous endeavor of doing what is true, persistent, rebelious, defiant, conscious, wild and right, no matter fuckin’ what.

The only 7 evils in existence: murder, theft, assault, rape, lying, coercion and exploitation.

Both literally and metaphorically, EVERYTHING else is a good, moral and greater thing to do, and therefore a RIGHT.

A “wrong” is differentiated from an “evil”, by intent. If someone is well intentioned, or at least not bad intentioned, but commits a wrong out of ineptitude, inattention or any kind of sincere mistake, that is not evil. It is a mistake, that should be morally dealt with and learned from.

An “evil” on the other hand, is any wrong that is committed with the specific intention of doing wrong (deliberate evil), or with the intent to satisfy some whim or egotistical desire, regardless of whether that desire veers towards something right or wrong (ignorant evil).

Good and greater things, are anything and everything that is other than evil. 

A right is any act that is different than the 7 evil acts. More specifically, if a “wrong” or “evil” act is any action that initiates any of the 7 evils towards one’s self or another, a “right” or “good / moral / righteous” act is any act that, at the very least, does not initiate any of the 7 evils towards one’s self or another.

With regards to the use of what is called usually called “destructive force”, it is always immoral to initiate it towards the innocent (i.e. those who have yet to deliberately commit evil) and the truly redeemed (i.e. those who may have committed evil, but who have genuinely had a change of heart and mind, and are no longer committing evil, because they choose to do good and greater things, no matter what).

Concurrently, if someone has already initiated or tried to initiate “force” towards another, without equivalent provocation, then it is ALWAYS MORAL to RETALIATE and AVENGE against the evil and the ones committing it.

“Who started it?” is always one of the first questions to ask, when it comes to recognizing who’s in the right and who’s in the wrong, regarding any particular use of “force” against another.

Of course, there is such a thing as nuance and things are infinitely complex, but to have any nuance, variation and “shades of whatever”, there are first the principles and prime aspects, from which those variations are derived.

There are links on this page, to the work of others whom I disagree with and some of whose elements and aspects of character I actually revile, but whom I do appreciate in other regards, and consider them to actually be doing more good than bad in the world, and whose work I find pertinent enough to share.

Derrick Broze, an Anarchy and Liberty oriented journalist and activist: https://theconsciousresistance.com/

Book, “The end of all evil”, by Jeremy Locke: https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=472BB40F21A8E0FC1B3809F2F645EC59