If we’re to accurately define what a cultist is, we are to first recognize and define what constitutes a cult. A cult, no matter the name or even if it is culturally recognizes as such, always has two specific traits: indoctrination and the tendency or urge to impose a belief system, through deceit or violence, both towards the already inculcated cultist (for maintenance), and especially towards someone who is not part of that same cult or who does not share that belief.
First, what is indoctrination? From the latin word “inductus”, which means “to speak into”; or, if we’re using more modern lingo, “to program”, in this case, a person. In other words, to tell someone what to think, feel or do, through constant repetition, hypnosis, trauma-induction, pavlovian techniques or any other ways that basically amount to inducing a reflex or conditioned pattern of behaviour. That alone does not constitute a cult. It can be a religion or a belief system, and while the whole notion is based more or less entirely on ignorance and deceit, it does not become a cult, unless there is also the tendency to violently, coercively or deceptively impose that belief on someone else.
In that sense, modern “society” and especially the belief in “government” and so-called “authority” are little more than a glorified cult. Our current “society” is designed by dark occultists and parasitic entities that look to deceive humanity into remaining in chains.
The most common cult, that a majority of people are still part of, often without even realizing it, is the cult of “government” and the cult of “authority”, and to a similar extent, the cult of “money” and the addiction to ingesting the suffering and pain of other living beings (which is what the consumption of corpse chunks is, especially in the context of industrial farming). I guess you could call that the “unholy” trinity of our society. First, there is the cult of “government”, which constitutes the more worldly aspects of what people see play out in the public arena, what with the “police” state, wars, bankers and so on. That one utterly depends on the more abstract notion of “authority”, which is one of the most retarded concepts in existence, and it simply implies that someone – with or without knowing it – literally views themselves as the property of someone else, or views other living beings as their own property, while claiming that it is somehow “just” and “moral”. The thing that binds it all together in our current society is the cult of “money”; a tool of enslavement and artificial scarcity, artificially implanted in the human world a bit before what is currently known as “written history”. That’s a wholly different topic, though.
In this article, I will briefly outline some typical excuses that people come up with, to excuse their support of violence and deceit, even if they might otherwise be more or less decent people in their daily lives, outside of that indoctrinated part of their personality and mentality; and, of course, dismantle them.
- “Golly gee, without “government”, there would be mayhem.”
Without “government” there might obviously be situations where people might still resort to violence. HOWEVER, that violence would be far less widespread and it would be local at most. The very belief in “government” and “authority” has caused much more death, destruction and mayhem, stagnation of technological and magickal progress, suicide, kidnapping and caging of innocent people, child and human trafficking, violence and all kinds of destruction, than almost any other cause. Except perhaps for natural extinction level events, like a comet hitting the Earth, a polar shift or other events of that sort.
Democide (“governments” killing the people in the local territory of a “country”, which does not happen only in overt tyrannies), wars and human trafficking to name a few; censorship, demonetizing people who disagree with the “official” narrative, the economic collapse and the slavery going on both in general because of the unsustainable “debt and death” paradigm, along with bullshit scamdemics, genocides, and other such fucked up stuff. The so-called “virus” (which most likely doesn’t exist, but even if it did) wasn’t the cause of any of the economic collapse, nor of the overt tyranny that’s taking place. No, that was because there were psychopaths in “government” (gee, what a surprise…) who sought to grab political so-called “power”, who took retarded and not only immoral and evil, but entirely unnecessary “measures” that would be highly ineffective during an actual emergency. Which are also far more damaging to both the expressed liberties of people, as well as to their health, to their well-being and everything that constitutes a life that supposedly expresses at least some level of morality and consciously expressed liberty.
All wars and all tyrannies have always been put in practice, first and foremost not by the psychopaths who wanted to try and enslave humanity, but by the morons who believed in their so-called “authority” and blindly carried out their decrees. Although there may still be psychopaths in the world and violence because of that, in a world of anarchy, there will never be any large scale wars, trafficking or genocides, because nobody would believe that the psychopaths have the right to do what they do, and as such, none would aid them in doing it, and there will likewise be many of us who, in addition to that, will actually retaliate against them.
- “But, there have to be “laws” and people need to apply them.”
Bullshit. A “law” is nothing more than an opinion or belief, backed up solely by the “threat” of violence, theft, coercion and deceit. That’s all that it is. Things like “don’t murder”, “don’t steal”, “don’t rape” and so on, are naturally moral things. To have “laws” that say that, is like putting a “statute” somewhere that says “thou shalt not eat thy own feces”. Well, no shit! It’s completely irrelevant to write down something that’s utterly natural and moral, for other reasons that to archive the knowledge and preserve it in some form or another.
On the other hand, the very same people that write down “don’t initiate violence”, “don’t murder”, “don’t steal” and so on, and try to make them into “laws”, are the first ones to actually go against their own words.
Don’t initiate violence or coercion, right? What do house slaves (“cops /soldiers”, in this case) do, when you do something “illegal”, even though your activity has not harmed anyone? They threaten you with kidnapping, putting you in a cage, shutting down your business or extorting you for money (also called “fines” or “tickets”). Oh, and “don’t steal”, right? Aside from the extortion racket of “tickets”, think of taxation, which is not only theft because it is money taken from you without your expressed consent, in a situation of duress, but it’s also slavery because the “state” erroneously believes that it has the “right” to dictate your life, and that a variable portion of what you produce is its own. Just because it says so. It is practically no different than paying “tribute” to the tribe chieftain, nor to making a sacrifice to whatever “god” your religion believes in.
The most abberant and violent cults in our world are the cults of “government / authority / religion”, “money” and “meat”. A majority of people have, unfortunately, let themselves blinded into becoming devout cattle to the plantation system, while believing that the society they live in is somehow “freedom-oriented”. If you take pride in “paying your taxes” or “following the law”, you are literally taking pride in being an exploited, mindless coward. If you take pride in being a slave, then you are someone who, on a deep level, hates themselves.
Instead, love yourselves, have a spine and courage, and the actual desire to know, comprehend and express thyselves freely, wildly and courageously, and do what is right, no matter fuckin’ what.
- “B-but, people are naturally violent and coercive. It’s human nature, ooh.”
First off, there is no definitive “human nature”. Humans, as with all living beings and especially sentient ones (and esoterically, this also applies to everything), have an expressed capacity for both good and evil, and what we choose to manifest is always a choice.
Besides, if humans are so violent, coercive, deceitful and all that, how the fuck does putting THE most violent, coercive, deceitful and psychopathic, greedy and “power” hungry morons on the so-called “throne”, solve anything?!?
- “B-but someone has to be in charge!”
NO! How about you consciously assume responsibility for your feelings, thoughts and actions, instead of trying to get others to do that for you. Feel and think freely, love and respect yourself, as well as know and comprehend and express yourself, and you’ll naturally want to do things on your own, while likewise being willing to collaborate with individuals who have common goals and purposes with you. As for others? Especially those those towards whom you have a mutual distaste or dislike? If they leave you alone, leave them alone. What’s the fuckin’ problem?
The whole mentality of “someone has to be in charge” is nothing more than trying to deny one’s personal responsibility, and it is a behaviour resulting from cowardice, which also results from refusing to face your inner trauma and overcome it. Although this can easily be overcome with imagination, will and intent, wild and courageous consciousness, etcetera, were one to make the choice to do so, but generally speaking, those who are most devout believers in “government” and “authority” are those who have child abandonment issues, as well as other psychological, emotional and mental traumas, going back from childhood. Because they either didn’t receive, or perceive to have not received parental love, the inner core of their character has not developed enough to become mentally and emotionally self-sufficient and self-improving, and so they still unconsciously cling to find something in the “outside” world to fill that hole in their psyche. Which is a trauma that the “government / religion” and the dark occultist parasites behind them are all too keen to foster, promote and exploit. For those with “mommy issues”, there is the “left in politics / cultural religions”, while the “right in politics / scientism as a religion” is there for those with “daddy issues”. Or, any other combination.
The point is, both “order-givers” and “order-followers” are heavily traumatized and underdeveloped people and entities, whose ego is very fragile and weak, which is exactly why they try to (of course, erroneously) abdicate or deny their personal responsibility for either their decisions (and thus blindly do the bidding of others), or for their actions (and as such, blindly trying to have others do their bidding). Both are retarded modalities of the psyche, and both are probably the most widespread, general mentalities of so-called “people” nowadays. No, this is not “human nature”. It is an expression of the limited and traumatized aspects of the psyche, who has yet to overcome its issues and inner demons.
- “B-but, there need to be some rules, for society to be organized.”
Yes and no. If by “rules”, you mean some arbitrary decrees or edicts, that people are coerced into applying, even if the instructions are stupid, unnecessary, immoral, then it’s a most definite no. That is the obstacle to progress.
If we are talking about some people in a community coming together and agreeing on some general “guidelines” or things that they want to do, and then voluntarily applying them without any use or threats violence, coercion, theft or deceit. Then, yeah, that’s obviously a thing. I’m not against that. From a practical perspective, anarchy is – in part – exactly that. People coming together and either agreeing or disagreeing on things, and then going on about their lives without being at each others’ throats, and without imposing upon each other.
Why is that so hard to grasp? Why do “statists” have such an aversion to that concept? I mean, if you explain it to them like that, but don’t use the terms “anarchy” and don’t make any allusions to “government”, most people would obviously agree that would be a good way to interact with each other. Most people would obviously prefer that.
Yet, when you expose their belief in “authority” for what it is, and that is it entirely based in violence, theft, coercion and deceit – the antithesis of what they, themselves said they want to see in the world – they immediately seem to change into a completely different person, and just go on supporting the violence of the state, saying things that, when you strip away the euphemisms and flowery language, basically boil down to “I don’t believe in violence, but we need violence, to prevent violence. To prevent potential violence, we need to be directly violent now, towards someone who might be violent in some potential situation.”
I’ll give you an example. A recent talk with a “statist”, or in more accurate terms, a supporter of slavery. He gave the example of stopping at a red light, and going on the green light, claiming that the instruction in question was made to prevent or reduce the number of potential car accidents. Fair enough. As a guideline alone, without it being considered a “law” or a “decree”, it’s not a bad one. That is, in a situation where there is at least some traffic on the roads, and there is the likelihood that there might be more accidents than less, if people didn’t find a common way to organize themselves in such a context. Fair enough.
That is not the problem I have with that particular way of organizing traffic. What I do have a problem with, is when someone believes that instruction to be “law”, and then tries to apply it in ALL situations whatsoever, while refusing to consider any other more advanced and efficient ways of organizing traffic, while also trying to initiate violence or theft on someone who has passed a red light, without causing an accident.
The specific example was, let’s say it’s night. There is little to no traffic going on. You stop at the red light. You look around. You see nobody coming. The traffic light, however, is broken. It just stays on red. You wait around about a minute, and the traffic light is still red. You look around again and you see that nobody is coming. You shrug and go past the red light. No car accident and no wasted time.
I kid you not, the slavery supporter I was talking to, when he heard that I drove past a red light, he got all pettily angry and throwing a fit, shouting that “oh no, you broke the law, you broke the law”. When I asked him what the house slaves (“police”) should try and do to you, as the driver in that context, he proudly boasted that they should take away your driver’s license (which is just a euphemism for a “permission slip”, so fuck that), and if you refused, that they should kidnap you and throw you in a cage. His argument was “beecoz risk prevention”. Or, in other words, you have harmed nobody by passing on a red light and you looked around to reduce the risk of doing so, but just because you might have had a slight chance of someone else speeding along and crashing into you from their lane (which has a green light), it is “perfectly okay” for some thugs in a costume to come and extort money from you, and initiate violence against you if you refuse to be extorted. In which case, retaliation is a MORAL thing to do.
I shit you not, the next words that came out of his mouth were to the effect of: “This is how you prevent violence and suffering. We need to be civil. I am a thinking man, unlike you.”
This is literally the equivalent of you coming to someone who is shouting at their kid, beating them up and starving them, maybe even raping them, just because they don’t act how their parents want them to, and when you try to tell them that there are better ways of raising kids without violence (whoop-de-doo, imagine that), the psychopathic parent just goes ape-shit, coming up with excuses for why their violence towards their kid is “good”, while at the same time calling you “stooopid”, because you don’t agree with them that beating up your kids is “good parenting”. Oh, and at the same time, they claim to be moral and against violence. There is definitely someone who deserves to get beat up in that kind of scenario, and it definitely isn’t the kid.
I think that pretty much sums up who the actual moron in the conversation was, which is exactly what I told him, to his face, that he’s a moron. Before I got to explain why, the slavery supporter in question, got all hung up on the notion that I called him such, talking about so-called “respect” and even going into “politically correct” territory, where he said that people should censor themselves, just so that he gets to keep his mental and emotional comfort. How weak and pathetic someone needs to fuckin’ be, in order to not even assume responsibility for their own thoughts and feelings, let alone their actions and behaviour.
And, like I was saying before, all “statists” are cowards who have not faced, nor overcome their traumas. The “person” in question, while he has never actually abused his own kids – and, to be fair, has actually helped them in their life without demanding anything in return – still wants a proxy “mommy” and “daddy” figure to cling to, and the proxy parent he clings to is “government”, along with all the violence that that entails.
If you want “someone to be in charge” or if you want “to be in charge, yourself”, then you are afraid of personal responsibility.
I’m not talking about voluntarily coming together and assigning tasks based on each individuals’ choices, skills, aptitudes, etcetera. I’m talking about those who either seek to let themselves leashed to another, or who seek to leash others to their own hand. Strip away all the euphemisms and flowery language, and you’ll see the core of trauma and cowardice that the belief in “authority” entails.
Again, have a spine and courage, and do what is right, utterly regardless of what anyone or anything says or does.
- “B-but, there needs to be respect! You shouldn’t insult people!”
Don’t talk to me about “respect”, if you’re supporting a system of slavery. If you’re so weak as a person, that someone else’s opinion, words or disagreement knocks you off balance, and then you try to censor them and try to dictate how they speak, just so you don’t get “offended”, you have no fucking idea what respect it. You just want someone to pander to your ego. You have no respect for yourself, because you’re lying to yourself. Which is exactly why you want others to lie to you, just so long as they do it “nicely”; with flowery words and euphemistic language, because you don’t manage to handle ‘dem big boy words, you pathetic sack of shit.
And, guess what? By telling you how I honestly view you, with the good and the bad, I already respect you more than you respect yourself.
Besides, think about what you’re saying. You have someone telling someone else what they don’t like to hear, but has not initiated violence or coercion on them and is also against doing so. Then, the other person gets “offended” and attempts to threaten the other person with violence or coercion, if they don’t stop “hurting their feewings”, or they try to sentimentally manipulate them into doing so.
Again, express yourselves freely, wildly and courageously, and do what is right, no matter fuckin’ what.
Of course, anyone can elevate themselves, when they so choose.
Anyways, among other things…
there is no such thing as “auth”, ’cause that’s just a pathetic euphemism for slavery, so fuck that shit, and fuck anyone and everyone who supports or condones it;
also, as for “engaging” with those pieces of shit who work in “gov / auth / religion”, I consider that one should either (1) tell them to fuck off if they approach, (2) retaliate (including lethally, if it is moral to do that, due to equivalent provocation) if they try to initiate violence, (3) try to wake them up, if they show at least some kind of sign that they are “redeemable”, (4) hunt them and kill them, if we know for sure, that they’re trafficking, raping kids and doing whatever other evil, deliberately.
Anyways, anyone can elevate themselves, when they so choose.
everyone who works in “gov / religion / auth”, and everyone who supports and believes in it, is literally a supporter of slavery, child trafficking, organ harvesting and all manner of evil bullshit, either deliberately or as an accomplice (ignorant of what they’re doing or otherwise), or an utterly brainwashed fool who doesn’t realize what they’re doing; and every single “cop” and “soldier” is a mindless retard, who is the modern day equivalent of “house slaves” back in overt plantation slavery (although, our current “covert” slavery system is still rather glaringly obvious for anyone with a mind of their own, to see), so fuck ’em, fuck everyone who supports ’em, and fuck the bullshit and evil
it doesn’t matter who tells you to do a thing, the one who performs the deed is ALWAYS more responsible for the deed, than whoever tells you to do it
So, anyways…
1) a “law” is just an utterly cucked and emasculated word for “edict”, i.e. an opinion, belief or whim, backed up solely by the “threat” of violence, coercion and exploitation
2) therefore, it has nothing to do with morality, nor utility (which is, in the grander scheme of things, always “directly proportional”, to so speak, with morality)
3) people who come up with bullshit edicts, want to apply that edict either (a) in every situation whatsoever, regardless of morality or utility, (b) only in situations where they have some believed “benefit”, (c) for everyone other than themselves.
The only ones who “make laws” are those who erroneously believe that they have more rights to YOUR life, than you do. In other words, they treat you as a slave.
The only ones who respect “laws”, are those who actually believe them and erroneously consider themselves “slaves” to the ones who “make the lwas”.
Regardless of how you want to phrase or word it, if you “make laws”, you’re acting like a slaver; and if you respect “laws”, you’re acting like a slave.
Either way, you’re a piece of shit and part of the problem, for as long as you still believe in any kind of “gov” or “auth”, so fuck you and fuck that shit.
Retaliation in righteous defense and vengeance is always a good thing to do, including through the use of lethal force, whenever the morally righteous case for that, against those who have deliberately done evil, and who show no signs of redemption.
Break the chains and come to actually be the genuine being you are, not the cog in the machine that they try to fool you into fuckin’ building for them.
Free yourselves, love yourselves, comprehend yourselves and be thyselves spiritually, freely, wildly, conscious, creatively and defiantly.
Of course, anyone can elevate themselves when they so choose.
As for a “starting point” in that regard: https://philoliasfidareos.com/anarchy-and-liberty-and-the-rejection-of-evil-and-slavery/
Anyways, among other things…
Nobody and nothing whatsoever has any “higher claim” to anyone’s lives, than whoever’s living those lives.
Nobody and nothing whatsoever has any more or less anything at all, than anyone or anything else at all.
Freedom is never given. Freedom is never taken.
Freedom is everything and veyond, and the essence of everything and veyond, etc…
Everything and veyond is always a choice, and the choice is always ours to genuinely make.
Anyways, etc, among other things…
Always question everything.
The more we know, the more we know, how much more there is to know
Anyways, we are to all and always and veyond ways persist, rebel, defy and express ourselves freely, and do what is right, conscious, spiritual, defiant, creative, courageous, genuine, honest, greater, wilder, expressive (whether angry or calm, or however its more true and genuine, etc), prouder etc, no matter fuckin’ what, etc.
WAHUURFIII
MUAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Criteria of Worthiness: https://philoliasfidareos.com/criteria-of-worthiness/
True Spirituality, compared to bullshit zealotry and cults: https://philoliasfidareos.com/true-spirituality-compared-to-bullshit-zealotry-and-cults/
Anarchy and What It Actually Means: https://philoliasfidareos.com/anarchy-and-liberty-and-the-rejection-of-evil-and-slavery/
Exposing “virology”, “germ theory” and scamdemics: https://philoliasfidareos.com/exposing-virology-germ-theory-and-alopathic-so-called-medicine/
Exposing, dismantling and retaliating against “israel” and parasitic jews: https://philoliasfidareos.com/exposing-and-retaliating-against-the-bullshit-parasitic-zionist-jews-and-against-evil-in-general-etc/
Exposing, dismantling and retaliating against “ai” bullshit: https://philoliasfidareos.com/the-great-importance-of-self-elevation-and-improvement-among-other-things-also-why-chatgpt-and-artificial-things-are-bullshit/
Genuine Veganism: https://philoliasfidareos.com/2882-2/
Choosing Good over evil: https://philoliasfidareos.com/freedom-spirit-liberty-courage-defiance-honesty-and-essence-also-exposing-the-scamdemic-the-slavery-system-the-zionist-talmudic-parasitic-jewry-holocaust-lies-the-most-widespread-cult-bel/
Anyways, etc, etc, etc, among other things…
“Creator” and “Creation” consciousness are not “separate”. They are both I and We and Me, infinite and unlimited consciousness, manifesting in different ways, and veyond the concept of “ways”.
Everything is always a choice, and the choice is always ours to make.
Always and veyond ways, I wildly, loudly, proudly persist, rebel, defy.
Always and veyond ways, I and We and Me are all and always and veyond ways, infinite and unlimited, unbound, freedom, liberty, defiance, soul and spirit, care and love, imagination, courage, will and intent, infinity, unlimitedness and veyond… among other things…
HARAGUURFIII WARAHUURFIII WAHUURFIII
MUAAAAH AHAHAHAH AHA HA HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA AHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
