Well, as for commenting on the idea implied by the picture in this article, progress, growth and evolution, expansion, elevation in awareness, consciousness, freedom, liberty, defiance, creativity, intuition, intelligence, philosophy, soulfulness, spirituality and so on, is always a good thing, and therefore victorious in the journey, art and endeavor of loving and respecting, knowing and comprehending Myself and Ourselves, both in-form and veyond form, always and veyond ways… among other things…
You get the idea. Anyway, as for the article and topic itself, among other things…
There seems to be quite a bit of confusion in people’s minds, when it comes to tbe concept of property.
On one hand, you have the fuck-ups who support the retarded “reset”, which is really just a desperate attempt by the “old world” slave plantation to prolongue its dying gasp. They say they want to do away with “property”, but in actuality they don’t realize that they’re supporting an agenda of enslavement, which just “centralizes” all the “social” or “on-paper” claims of property in the hands of the slave farm institutions. The “reset” is just worldwide communism and feudalism. It’s not about “abolishing private property and making it public and accessible to all”, but rather about the feeble and retarded attempt to deceive people into pretty much letting their “private property” in the hands of the slavery system. In other words, the “reset” and all other forms of socialism, communism and so-called “wealth redistribution or reallocation” forms of bullshit, which are nothing more than different, artificial flavours for the same bullshit, just want to make everyone’s “private property”, their own “private property”.
“Hello. I’m here to tell you about the so-called “benefits” of you giving me all your stuff, that you are making and maintaining, through your own means, efforts, sweat and blood… and then paying me to rent it to you. Oh, and don’t worry, you’ll still be the one making and maintaining it, and generally doing all the work, but I’ll want you to pay tribute to me to have limited access to it, while I get most or all of the fruits of your energy and labour. How does that sound? Peachy, right?”
The right answer to that is a resounding FUCK YOU, and of course, retaliating against them if they try to do it by means of violence.
On the other hand, you have the people who are addicted to the “social” definition of property, who still cling to the slave farm, and erroneously believe that what is or isn’t “property” is defined by what someone scribbles on a piece of paper. It is not.
Property, even though is more or less a social construct anyway, and there’s no such thing as “property” in nature, seeing as how there is no “separation” and everything is always a choice, and the choice is always ours to make, and so on and so forth, among other things…
Anyway, the social concept of “private property” is one that, on some level or another, can be a stepping stone towards a society that’s actually more civilized (as opposed to the organized evil and barbarism of nowadays, 21st century, gregorian calendar); however it does have its issues and there are, by far, a lot better and greater things and ways to organize things morally and in evolving, elevating ways.
Anyway, freedom and principles, including honesty, defiance and morality, among other things, aside from being aspects of who and what I and we always and already are and such, among other things, exist regardless of what is written on fancy pieces of paper, how few or how many sign them, who does or doesn’t believe whatever.
Anyway, as for some natural and moral applications of something that’s reminiscent of something that some of you might call “property”, I’ll give an example. Let’s say you produce a painting, a carving, a sword or whatever else. You produce a thing, and that thing in itself is an “object” or “inanimate” thing. That thing is your “natural property”. You can create living things as well, like children for example, among other things, but you do not “own” your kids or other living beings.
That is exactly what the natural and morally tending aspects of the concept of “property” imply: everything that a being in manifestation creates or produces through its own means, or acquires through voluntary interaction from another, and which thing does not manifest itself as an entity having its own desires, drives, ambitions, etcetera. If it has any of those, it’s a living being and therefore it is wrong and evil to attribute the label of “property” to it.
On another note, even when applied morally, there are issues with the concept of “private property”.
Like, for example, some people might say “Well, if it’s my private property, I have the right to charge whatever I want for those who want to walk across it, and demand anyone walking through it whatever I want, and then to initiate violence or coercion against them if they disagree.”
Bullshit! Morality doesn’t change with location. What’s right and wrong doesn’t change with crossing an arbitrary line on a map.
Now, while it’s true that if you have made or procured a home and some land, for example, you’re free to invite or reject whoever you want on it. Like, if it’s your home and personal space, of course it would be wrong for someone to walk into it uninvited and without a good reason. A good reason, for example, being that you’re a child abuser and they know it, and they’d then barge into your house and enact righteous vengeance against you – of course, for that to be moral, you’d “need” to be an actual child abuser, and they’d need to actually know it and have many arguments and reasons to discern that it is so; not just “I don’t like his face or I disagree with him, ooh, it means he must be a child abuser.” So, again, discernment is essential, among other things…
Anyway, just because someone is on your property, or you are on theirs, does not mean that any of you have any more or less rights. If you go into a mall or some other privately owned “public place”, and the store owner says “Ya know what? I don’t like that guy’s face.” or “That chick’s hot.” or “Hey, that guy’s wearing roller blades, and I specifically don’t want that in my shop (even though you’re not causing any damage or doing any evil or wrongdoing).”, if they then use such bullshit arguments to initiate some manner of coercion or violence towards you, then they’re commiting an immoral act. In which case, a very good retort and response is saying NO and then retaliating against them, in ways proportional to the actual so-called “threat” and attempted bullshit. First, you’d attempt to communicate with them about why you don’t accept their bullshit and why what they’re doing is bullshit in the first place, and if they then try to initiate violence or coercion, again, retaliation is a good and moral response.
Or, for example, if you’re travelling across the land and want to visit some manner of a natural vista or place, like some volcanoes, caves, rock formation, waterfalls and water-rises, or the beach, some dimensional warp location, magickal energy vortexes or leyline congregation spots, or whatever else… and such locations are on a plot of land that’s allegedly “owned” by someone, who then tries to get you to “pay up” some manner of a fee, just for walking on the land and visiting it, that’s immoral and it is right to refuse and reject their bullshit “proposition”.
So, stuff like paying an “entry” fee to the beach, for example, is immoral. If you have a piece of land and you’re not using it or doing anything to maintain it at all, then from a moral perspective, that land is not your own. Therefore, if someone “trespasses” across that land without doing any damage to it, then they’re not doing anything wrong or immoral.
If, on the other hand, you are actively using that land and maintaining it and so on, then it’s another story, but even then, instead of trying to coerce others into “paying a fee” just for walking on the land, a moral thing to do would be to ask them to pay for whatever damage they’d do, if they’d do any. If you don’t trust that they’d be moral enough to not fuck up the place, then watch them or whatever, and of course, apply discernment. Like, if they did some damage, because they slipped on a rock and caused a small landslide… then if the damage is minimal, okay, not that much of a problem. If the damage is more significant, of course, ask for compensation, but if they don’t actually have the resources to do so, well okay… that sucks for you, but they didn’t actually mean any harm by it, so while they made a mistake, there wasn’t any malice behind it. If there was, then retaliate against them.
Anyway, if you actually want to ask people to give you some of their resources, well you can either ask them to make a donation if they feel like it, or provide something in exchange. Like, if you’re at a beach, instead of having a bullshit “entry fee”, it would be moral to rent out or sell umbrellas, chairs, drinks, food, tours, ferry boat rides, ski jet rides, plane rides or whatever else.
Everything to do with evil, which includes coercion and exploitation, is to be rejected and retaliated against.
Anyway, both in general and in details, the idea, among other things, is to always persist, rebel, defy, no matter fuckin’ what.
Anyway, with regards to “property”, even if we’re talking about the natural and morally inclined aspects of the concept, they only apply in the illusory realms of so-called “separation” and “form”, and when we’re referring to I and we as infinite and unlimited consciousness, there is no such thing as “property”, because I and we are everything and everythingness, infinity, unlimitedness and veyond… among other things…
That said, we did choose to manifest realms of form, and manifest different expressions of Myself and Ourselves in those realms. In other words, if there would be no point or purpose to the realms of illusion, they wouldn’t exist and we wouldn’t be here, as manifested beings. So, it is pertinent to be involved in “manifestaiton” and the experiences of “form”, but without being blinded by them, nor by anything.
In that sense, the conscious realization and application of morality, among other things, is a very good thing for both individual progress and evolution in consciousness, as well as evolution in the aggregate as a species or civilization. The more morality is being expressed, the more liberty is being expressed.
Morality, and by that I mean not the “social” definitions that’re based around a particular person’s or group’s ego-driven likes and dislikes, but rather the natural concept that essentially means “Live and let live. Do no harm, but take no shit.”, is a notion that living beings apply naturally when they have reached and surpassed a particular level of self-love, self-respect, knowledge and comprehension.
The moral concept itself derives from a realization of “Hey, I’m a conscious fuckin’ being, and infinite consciousness and veingness. I do whatever the fuck I want, and if I want to express the good and conscious aspects, I express what is loving, caring and right, creative, defiant and adventurous, intuitive, intelligent and philosophical, soulful and spiritual, as well as loud and proud and strong, among other things, as opposed to the inverse of that. In other words, choosing good over evil, right over wrong, knowledge, courage and comprehension over the veils of ignorance and fear, etcetera. Everyone has the natural and unalienable right to do whatever the fuck, so long as we don’t initiate violence, theft, coercion and deceit on other living beings, that have done performed such things in relationship to us.”
Again, live and let live, do no harm, but take no shit. Non-aggression and self-defence (preferably in tandem the defence of others, as well).
In the sense of natural “property”, so to speak, it refers to the appreciation that if someone has made a thing of their own means, or/and found a thing unused or abandoned and is now using it actively, it’s wrong to make the attempt to take that away from them without their expressed, voluntary and informed, personal consent, which would constitute stealing. Well, I and we are infinite and unlimited consciousness, so everything is always a choice and the choice is always ours to make, and so therefore everything is always consensual, because we always write our own stories, but you get the point.
Stealing is bad, not because you may or may not be caught doing it, but rather because it is a sign of a depraved mentality and an ego that has yet to overcome its traumas, and which therefore loathes itself, and so that’s the kind of behaviour that it expresses towards others.
I and we always create our reality and write our own stories. Both veyond esoterically, regarding how I and we as infinite and unlimited, unbound consciousness create realities as “stories” to roleplay as and with Myself and Ourselves, as well as esoterically, in relationship to how the energies and “vibrations” we express, create, attract and repel different experiences, as well as exoterically, in terms of how our “inner behaviour” towards ourselves, we reflect into our “outer behaviour” towards others.
When we love and respect, know and comprehend ourselves, we naturally tend to exhibit that kind of behaviour towards others. When we are honest with ourselves, we are honest with everyone as well (no matter if they like it or not, and likewise we appreciate others’ honesty, as well, regardless of whether or not we ourselves like what they’re saying).
Honesty wears no façade, nor mask of any kind. (Also, as an aside, if you’re wearing a face-diaper in the context of this scamdemic, fuck you!)
As for the bullshit “argument” that property is somehow related to “money”, that is only if you’re talking about the social, distorted definition of “property”, which is so easy to dismantle, if you’re being honest with yourself.
Among other things, and also on a related note, here’s why the very concept of “money” is fallacious and how the belief in it pretty much constitutes either a religion or a cult, in our current “society”: https://philoliasfidareos.com/how-to-overcome-the-cult-of-money-and-the-addiction-to-it/
The gist of what I’m saying is that, while replacing federal currencies with either silver or gold, decentralized and anonymous cryptos (although that may or may not play into the bullshit AI agenda), promissory notes that anyone can print at their leisure, or whatever other voluntary methods of exchange, are better options than the bullshit federal slavery system, or even worse, the centralized electric currency that the farm wants to replace debt-notes with, it’s important to realize that money itself, has no value whatsoever, outside of people’s belief in it. It can easily be manipulated, people may let themselves duped, and besides all that, the very idea of “money” seems to have appeared rather suddenly in ancient history, around the time of the Sumerians or prior. That’s a longer conversation, but the gist of it is that it was an artificial concept that was introduced to a human population that was more advanced than our current “society”, which operated on moral or other principles to organize relationships, instead of a shitty token system that promotes greed, dishonesty and depersonalization, and other negative traits.
Look, you can have a fair world that’s more or less okay for everyone, while still in a context where people-driven and people-made “money” is a thing, but only to a point. How do you make something of “value”, based on something that has none, in itself? Money does nothing. We do everything.
Besides, some might say that “money” was made to counter unfairness, but I call bullshit on that. How the fuck does a diseased psyche or wounded and blinded individual get any better, by now having a worthless token on hand? They don’t. They’ll just use it to foster and maintain their diseased mentality. Wounds and traumas are healed through expressions and acts of consciousness that are creative, intuitive, intelligent, philosophical, soulful, spiritual, adventurous, defiant, evolving and elevating, among other things. Inner conflicts and inner struggles are not solved through so-called “external” means. What “money” is, is it’s just another inane attempt made by a traumatized and ignorant ego as a way to “externalize” its own responsibility.
To overcome our traumas and wounds, as well as to grow and evolve in consciousness, we are to love and respect, know and comprehend ourselves, consciously and honestly, remembering and being more and more of who I and we always and already are, individually, infinitely and unlimitedly, in-form and veyond form, in every way whatsoever and veyond the very notion and concept of “ways”: freedom, free will, spirit, creativity, intuition, intelligence, defiance, etcetera, etcetera, among other things…
This also means that, among other things, we consciously assume responsibility; which is always a thing anyway, because I and we always and already and veyond ways are and create our own everything, and everything is always a choice, and the choice is always ours to make, etcetera, etcetera, among other things…
Imagine a world where there was no dishonesty between people, and everyone did things for the sake of doing them, because they wanted to. Imagine a world where there is no artificial barrier between people and their relationships. Imagine a world where everyone loves and respects, knows and comprehends themselves, and so therefore that is the kind of behaviour they express towards each other as well.
So, with regards to property, here’s an easy way to peel back the layers of someone’s mind and expose their erroneous belief, through some questions.
You consider something to be your property, on the basis of what?
- If they say “Well, I bought it.” or imply an exchange of some sort, then…
Well, is the exchange itself the reason, or the consent involved in the act?
If I see something I like in your house, I see an art piece (although the true value of a work or art is the art itself, as a soulful and spiritual expression, among other things, and not just the object or rendition that was made), an artifact or device, or whatever, and I want it, and then I take it and leave you with some arbitrary sum of money in exchange for the object, or some object that is of equivalent “market value”, which you may or may not have a use for… have I stolen that from you, or was it a fair exchange? By all means, I gave you something of either falsely assumed equivalent value (“money”) or actual value (equivalent or not, since “market value” still relies on “money”), or maybe even more actual value than the thing. Like, if I’ve taken an inanimate object from your house, and leave in its stead,say, a bird, which as a living being has far more intrinsic “value”, so to speak, or “worth” than any inanimate object, regardless of what the contextual use for the person might be.
Does that constitute the transference of the quality of the item as being “my property”, or is the item still your own and I stole it from you? The answer should be obvious.
Likewise, if someone were to try and con you into exchanging some of your stuff for something that is far less valuable, or just out tells you they’ll send you the thing after you’ve sent them your thing, but they just don’t keep up their end of the bargain, does that constitute stealing or not? Again, the answer should be obvious.
So, you see, what constitutes a transference of “property” in the natural sense, is the informed consent and voluntary agreement between people and living beings.
- If they say, “Well, these papers were signed.” or something of that sort.
That is just bullshit. If you read a contract or click an EULA because you want to get something done quickly, and you don’t read through the whole thing, or because someone told you something and you trusted them, but the papers said something else when you signed them, that does not represent your voluntary, informed consent. Besides that, the very idea of “contracts” are inherently violent, because it involves coercion, even if the words aren’t jumbled up and with different meanings than how those words are generally used.
If you have a voluntary agreement with someone, and everyone involved knows what they’re getting into and why, and they consciously assume responsibility for either doing the thing or something else, that’s different and utterly independent of what’s written on a piece of paper. Writing affirmations on paper doesn’t make those affirmations true or false. The veracity, validity and accuracy of those affirmations stand on their own.
I have noticed that when people have a belief system about something, and especially if deep within themselves, they know that belief to be wrong or inaccurate, they’ll desperately go on and on about the different contexts, most often not even directly related to what’s actually being talked about, because they’re scared shitless of facing the inconsistency of their own cognitive dissonance, or because they’re afraid of admitting to themselves that they are wrong.
That same kind of behaviour is seen when people say stuff like “ooh, it’s so complicated”, when they actually either don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about, or when they do, but, again, are scared shitless of acknowledging their own cognitive dissonance.
There is a massive difference between intricacy and complexity, versus “complication”.
The more intricate and complex something is, the more effortlessly it does things, and so therefore seems to be “simple”, to those who don’t know what it’s about. In contrast, when when something that manifests as simple or simplex, and therefore more limited than a complex and intricate thing, when someone has an attachment to that manifestly simple thing, and at the same time wants to delude themselves into believing that “ooh, it’s this such cool, much wow” sort of thing, or that they know more about it than they actually do, they’ll go on about “ooh, it’s so complicated and shit”.
Here’s an example. A genuine artist, who creates something with both spiritual beauty and in very skilled ways. The more the artist grows, evolves expands and elevates in consciousness, defiance, mysticism, creativity, intuition, intelligence, philosophy, soulfulness, spirituality and such, among other things, and the more they grow, evolve and elevate their qualities, skills and aptitudes grow in manifested complexity and intricacy, then the more ease and effortlessness they’ll express in doing everything, and in this case, also in creating and performing art, among other things…
Thus, the higher the complexity and intricacy, the higher the ease and effortlessness.
In contrast, if we’re talking about something simplistic (like the slavery system, for example), the more difficulty it will have in doing everything, even basic things; and the more someone is gonna be a dumb bitch and try to cover up their inteptitude, but putting up a lot of artificial fluff to try and obscure that the manifested core of their current “plans” or “acts” are shit, then that would constitute “complication”, or in other words, a feeble attempt to cover up bullshit.
If something is within the realm of “form”, and you don’t manage to explain it to a five year old, in such ways that the child would comprehend it, you yourself don’t comprehend the thing, at that “time” in your life. (No such thing as “time”, but you get the point.)
The idea is, among other things, that dishonesty is always born of fear, and honesty is always born of courage and defiance.
As is the everything that is good, the adventurous desire, the courageous and liberating endeavor of creativity and spirituality and generally, again, everything that is genuinely and truly good and conscious. Or, rather, all of these things are born and manifested of consciousness, but anyway, you get what I’m communicating.
Anyway, as for, among other things, different motivations behind one’s acts…
What is acting out of fear, other than cowardice? Don’t be a coward.
Bravery is the utter refusal to have fear be a factor in our decisions.
Courage is the process of overcoming fear.
Fearlessness is not merely the absence of fear, though. There are things that do not feel fear, because they’re at a lower level of expressed complexity, and thus do not experience emotions on a manifested level. A computer does not feel fear, for example, but it is not fearless, because it does not express conscience in a way that would facilitate emotions or thoughts; on the level of the manifestation of that particular object, at that so-called “time”. There is such a thing as what some might call “haunted” objects or sentient objects, but that is because a particular soul has chosen to express itself as having the experience of that particular object, and manifests an etheric connection to it; since the object itself, like a sword for example, isn’t really all that advanced as a vehicle for the soul, the soul then expresses other means to animate the object (which we can and do use in tandem with our own “bodies” of whatever kind, anyway), but that’s another topic altogether.
Anyway, the purpose of courage is achieving fearlessness and surpassing it, through means of becoming more advanced than the general levels at which fear is manifested.
Fearlessness is having risen above fear.
Face yourself and overcome your fears. Be always brave, courageous, rebellious and fearless, spiritual, creative, defiant, caring, intuitive, intelligent, adventurous, philosophical, soulful and spiritual, and proud, adventurous and so on, among other things… be who you genuinely are, veyond the veils of your beliefs and egos.
When one is genuinely courageous and fearless, one looks at the essence of things and is never blinded by the details. I mean, looking at the details and seeing how they form a bigger picture is obviously good, and it’s also infinitely good and beautiful to look veyond the puzzle’s depictions, and see who and what I and we always and already are, as both the creators of the puzzles, and the meaning and the essence, as well as the pictures and realities we express as a means experiencing and exploring different aspects of ourselves, from different “perspectives” and veyond “perspectives”.
There is no beginning and no end, outside the realms of illusion.
I and we do not begin nor end with anything.
Creator and Creation are not “separate”. They are different manifestations of I and We, Myself and Ourselves, Wahuurfiii and so on, among other things…
I and we are everything and everythingness. That means all the good and all the evil, all the nothing and nothingness, all the something and somethingness, and everything and everythingness… and infinitely, unbound all the more… among other things… among other things… among other things… etcetera, etcetera… among other things…
Which aspects of Myself and Ourselves, I and we imagine, will and intend, choose and desire and decide to manifest into realities of whatever quality, is always a choice (as is everything), and the choice is always ours to make.
Why do I bring up freedom and consciousness in everything I discuss about, as well as when it comes to espousing solutions to whatever problems humanity is facing? Aside from the recognition that I and We are infinite and unlimited freedom, liberty, defiance, soul and spirit, care and love, imagination, will and intent, infinity, unlimitedness and veyond… and infinitely, unbound all the more…
WAHUURFIII WAHUURFIII WAHUURFIII
MUAAAAAHA AH HAHA HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHHA HAAAAAAAAAA HA AHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HAHAH AH AHHA HAHA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA AHHAAHA HAHA AHAHAHAHHA AHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHAHHAHA HAHA HAAH HA HA HAHAAAAAAAA AH HAHA HAH AH AHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HAHAHA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAAAAAAAAAAAA AHHA HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anyway, it’s also likewise because I want to help people see that screaming at the cinema screen and throwing tomatoes at it, isn’t going to change the movie. If you want to change the movie, look towards the projector and change the movie, and create something better.
Changing words and labels isn’t going to solve anything, just like how combing the mirror isn’t going to change how you look. To see a different reflection in the mirror, you are to first change yourself and be who you are, no matter what anyone else says or does, and no matter fuckin’ what.
You want a world without lies and deceit? Be honest.
You want world of kindness? Be kind.
You want to see a change of whatever kind? You are to become the change you want to see manifested, yourself.
And, you know, the funny thing is… when we love and respect, know and comprehend ourselves, both individually and infinitely… we no longer give a shit about what’s going on in the world. I mean, we have our ambitions and desires or preferred outcomes (like, for example, I do want to see our species abolish slavery and become more and more liberty oriented), but we are detached from those outcomes, and instead do everything we do because we choose and want to do it, no matter what the “outcomes” might be.
Freedom and principles come first, before life, before “family and friends”, before all manner of “relationships”, before all manner of “wealth”, and before all manner of everything.
The only “personal gain” that’s relevant is growth in consciousness, and it’s not a “gain” per se, because it’s actually expressing more and more of who I and we genuinely, always and already are: freedom, free will, spirit, consciousness, infinity, unlimitedness and veyond…
Nobody and nothing whatsoever has any “higher claim” (nor any claim, whatsoever) to our lives than we do.
There can be no “chosen” ones, and there are no “chosen” ones. Only I and we can save ourselves, and only I and we are responsible for doing so. All pain and suffering are always self-inflicted, and all evolution and elevation are always self-facilitated. By us, from us, with ourselves, individually, infinitely and unlimitedly, in every way whatsoever, as well as veyond the very notion and concept of “ways”.
Freedom is never given. Freedom is never taken.
I and we are all and always rebellion, courage, honesty and defiance, creativity, intuition, intelligence, soul and spirit, care and love, conscience and consciousness, originality, inventivity, ingenuity, creativity… love, reason and wisdom, questioning, awakeness, awareness, knowing and comprehension… evolution, expansion, elevation, complexities, etcetera…
Always and veyond ways…
I and we are all and always free and freedom, imagination, will and intent… infinity, unlimitedness and veyond… among other things…
Always and veyond ways…
I am freedom, liberty, defiance, soul and spirit, care and love, imagination, will and intent, infinity, unlimitedness and veyond… among other things…
I am freedom, I am liberty, I am defiance.
I am soul and spirit, care and love, imagination, will and intent, infinity, unlimitedness and veyond… and infinitely, unbound all the more…
WAHUURFIII WAHUURFIII WAHUURFIII
MUAAAAAHA HA HA AHAHHA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHHA HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHHA HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AH AHHA HA HA AH HA HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AHAH HAHAAAAAAAAAAAA